Corrections
We get things wrong sometimes. When we do, we fix it in the open and leave a record of what changed.
Last updated .
How a correction works here
The error is fixed in the article itself, and a dated note at the foot of the piece says what it said before. Both halves matter. Fixing it quietly would leave anyone who read the wrong version with no way to find out, and a note without a fix leaves the error standing.
A correction note looks like this: "Correction, August 29, 2026: an earlier version said the game launches at $19.99. It is $14.99. We have fixed the price above."
What gets a note
The response scales to the mistake. A typo or a broken link gets a quiet fix, because a note about a missing comma is noise dressed up as accountability.
Anything that could have changed a decision you made gets a visible, dated note. A wrong price, a wrong release date, a wrong platform, a wrong studio: if it touched what you might have bought or when, you get told.
Articles do not disappear
A published article is not silently deleted, and its URL does not change, even when a correction changes what the headline means. A link to a story from last year keeps working.
If a piece ever has to come down, we say that it came down and why, rather than leaving a gap where it used to be.
When a review turns out to be wrong
Games change after release. If a recommendation rested on a bug that has since been patched, or on missing content that has since arrived, we will revisit it.
What we will not do is quietly rewrite the old verdict. A revisit carries a dated update explaining what changed and why our view moved, because a small studio deserves a record of the judgment as well as the revision.
Tell us
If something here is wrong, write to contact@intheindie.com and point at it. A link to the article and a line about what is off is plenty.
Readers and developers catch things we miss, and we would rather be corrected than be wrong for longer. Nobody needs to argue their way past a defensive editor to get a fact fixed.